The Association of U S West Retirees



Court Limits Judge in KPMG Case
By Chad Bray
The Wall Street Journal
Wednesday, May 23, 2007

NEW YORK -- A federal appeals court said Wednesday that a district judge overseeing the criminal trial of a group of former KPMG LLP executives doesn't have the jurisdiction to oversee a separate legal-fee dispute with the firm.

In an opinion Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals said U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan can't hold an ancillary proceeding to determine whether KPMG should be required to pay legal fees for the former executives who have been charged criminally with promoting illegal tax shelters.

"We vacate the order asserting ancillary jurisdiction as beyond the district court's power," the circuit found.

Last June, Judge Kaplan found that prosecutors violated the former executives' constitutional rights by putting undue pressure on the firm not to advance them defense costs.  The former executives then filed a civil complaint against KPMG seeking legal costs.

The appeals court dismissed that complaint as part of their order on Wednesday, saying an ancillary proceeding may not be the proper way to remedy the constitutional violations.  KPMG had argued that the legal-fee issue should be decided by an arbitration panel, as set out in the firm's partnership agreement, rather than by Judge Kaplan.

Prosecutors have charged 16 former KPMG executives and two others with allegedly participating in a scheme that allowed wealthy individuals to avoid paying billions of dollars in taxes to the Internal Revenue Services.  Five people, including former KPMG tax partner David Rivkin, have pleaded guilty to criminal charges in the matter.

The criminal case has been on hold pending the outcome of the legal-fee dispute.

A conspiracy charge was dropped against KPMG itself last December after the firm fulfilled the terms of its 2005 deferred prosecution agreement with the government, in which KPMG agreed to pay $456 million and admitted to fraudulent conduct in the design and marketing of certain tax shelters.  The deferred prosecution agreement allowed KPMG to avoid the fate of auditing firm Arthur Andersen LLP, which collapsed following a criminal indictment against it as part of the government's probe into Enron Corp.  A 2002 felony conviction against Andersen in the matter was overturned in 2005.

Separately, federal prosecutors said Wednesday that they won't prosecute Sidley Austin LLP criminally in connection with the probe of fraudulent tax shelters allegedly promoted by one of the law firm's former tax partners.

The U.S. attorney's office in Manhattan said it believes the criminal prosecution of former Sidley Austin tax partner Raymond J. Ruble individually "sufficiently vindicates the interests of law enforcement and the public."  Mr. Ruble is among the 18 individuals facing charges in the KPMG case.

"Prosecution of Sidley might have significant collateral consequences on partners, employees and clients of the firm," the office said in a press release.

In deciding not to prosecute Sidley Austin criminally, prosecutors noted that Mr. Ruble carried out a major part of the alleged fraud while a partner at Brown & Wood, a firm that merged with Sidley in May 2001.

The government said Sidley didn't write opinion letter for mass-marketed tax shelters prior to the merger and stipulated as part of the merger agreement that Mr. Ruble no longer engage in the practice of writing such letters and that he did so after the merger "largely by deception."

Prosecutors noted Sidley cooperated in the investigation, made a public statement of responsibility and entered an agreement with the Internal Revenue Service in which it has paid a $39.4 million civil penalty to resolve the agency's tax-shelter promoter penalty audit against the firm.

Write to Chad Bray at