|
|
|
|
Please Redistribute
December 6, 2005
Mimi Hull,
President
ASSOCIATION OF U S
WEST RETIREES (AUSWR)
AUSWR Board Members
and General Members
This update concern
the Phelps v. Qwest
Employees Benefit Committee case
pending in Denver Federal
Court (the ERISA
Disclosure case). The last
update was sent on September
21, 2005. As you know,
AUSWR Executive Director
Nelson Phelps formally
demanded Qwest make
disclosure of the
"investment policy
guidelines" and "proxy
voting guidelines" in order
to help him and the retiree
association police the
goings on with the Qwest
Pension Plan. Mr. Phelps
was particularly concerned
about a complete loss of a
$67 million "put option"
investment made with pension
fund monies in late 2001.
On December 2,
2005, Chief Judge Babcock
entered a ruling deciding
the central dispute between
the parties, i.e., whether
Qwest is required to provide
certain documents to Mr.
Phelps pursuant to §
104(b)(4) of the Employee
Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §
1024(b)(4). In
short, Chief Judge Babcock
ruled that Qwest does
not have to disclose
the requested proxy
voting guidelines, as
those matter are handled by
outside investment managers
and Qwest does not dictate
the terms of those
polices. However, with
respect to the more
important issue, Chief Judge
Babcock ruled Qwest
must turn over the
several investment
policies/guidelines that are
portfolio specific for the
pension plan.
This is an important
ruling. No
other retiree group has
made such a legal
challenge. Certainly, there
has been no other case like
this one filed anywhere
within the federal courts
making up the 10th Circuit
Court of Appeals (i.e.,
Colorado, Kansas, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and
Wyoming). This legal issues
resolved in the Phelps case
is significant not only for
AUSWR, but for other retiree
groups and individual
retirees who, too, want to
police their pension plan
and, therefore make written
requests for information
concerning pension plan
operations. Retirees should
not have to pursue a federal
lawsuit simply to find
out more about how the
pension plan is being
managed or mismanaged. You
can read Chief Judge
Babcock's December 2, 2005
Order at this URL:
http://www.uswestretiree.org/Order120205Phelps.pdf
The next
step in this case is for
Qwest to produce the
requested investment
policies/guidelines and
answer some questions we
asked back in January 2005.
We will pursue our request
that Chief Judge
Babcock impose a daily fine
on the company and order
payment of costs and
attorney's fees, so as to
deter this type of obstinate
behavior in the future when
we make requests for other
disclosures and information
about the Qwest Pension
Plan.
Meanwhile, to learn
more, you should
visit the "Legal
Developments" page
at the AUSWR
website http://www.uswestretiree.org/legal2.htm
and under the
heading "ERISA
Disclosure -
Phelps v. Qwest" view
all of the updates,
the Complaint and
other legal papers
that have been
posted.
|